19 Bolshaya Ordynka, Bldg. 1, Moscow · Mon–Fri 10:00–18:00+7 925 210-09-01 · info@pravo-p.ru
+7 925 210-09-01Позвонить+7 925 495-95-35WhatsApp+7 925 495-95-35TelegramMAXНаписать
Home → Services → Defense Against Subsidiary Liability in Russia
Directors · Controller Liability

Defense Against Subsidiary Liability in Russia

We defend directors, shareholders, beneficiaries and other alleged controlling persons against subsidiary liability claims in Russian bankruptcy proceedings.

Practical approach

We address each alleged basis separately: control, causation, transactions, accounting records, timing of the financial crisis and the amount claimed.

Documents useful for the first review

How we work

  1. Analyse the claim and case.
  2. Build a management and financial timeline.
  3. Test alleged controller status and presumptions.
  4. Prepare evidence on causation and actual role.
  5. File objections and motions.
  6. Represent the client at hearings and appeals.

Key risks

Controller statusThe court may examine actual influence, not only formal title.
Accounting recordsFailure to preserve or transfer required records can be significant.
CausationThe dispute often turns on whether conduct caused creditor loss.
QuantumThe amount claimed requires separate analysis.

Preparing for the first consultation

The document set for Defense Against Subsidiary Liability in Russia depends on the facts already recorded, the parties involved and the stage of the procedure. We therefore check the source documents before fixing the filing route.

FAQ

Common questions

Can a former director be sued?

Yes, if the relevant period and conduct fall within the statutory framework.

Does nominee status automatically avoid liability?

No.

Can the amount be reduced?

Russian bankruptcy law contains rules relevant to the amount in defined circumstances.

Should defense preparation start early?

Yes, if a claim is foreseeable.

For Defense Against Subsidiary Liability in Russia, the first useful step is to identify the practical result, then test the documents and procedure against that result rather than relying on a generic template.